Just the Guy We Need for Government 2.0

We’ve been ganging up on Twitter lately. Much of it deserved. However, we’ve already bumped into brand new friends from all points of the compass by using this strange tool. And, then, just yesterday, we saw that Dan joined. Thank goodness.

danpowers1

Dan Powers is the Community Affairs Manager for the Boulder Chamber of Commerce, but he also has enough other irons in the fire to be called a Colorado Renaissance Man.

We’ve written about Dan before in “Who Killed East Boulder’s Blog?” It’s a frightening and cautionary tale. And the experience temporarily drove him away from a leadership position in the discussion about citizen involvement in East Boulder county politics.

So, to make sure he connects with people in his area who are talking about the issues he cares about we wanted to make sure he “Advanced” on Search.Twitter.com. We just wrote about this site in “Going Next Door for a Drink.

And, yes, just like any good search engine, the brilliant minds over at Search.Twitter.com once again named their “Beginner” button the “Advanced” tab. Nuts, isn’t it? – because all you have to do is fill in the little boxes.

Anyway, Dan can look to see who’s just written the word “politics” in Twitter – and limit that search to only those within 15 miles of his own home. Cool, frightening, weird, but entirely useful if he wants to find like-minded people right away.

danpowers2

Why are we so happy to see Dan Powers back in the Web 2.0 saddle? Because he’s the perfect “Patriot 2.O.”

You’ll get a better idea of what we mean by that term if you read Andrea Baker’s blog post from yesterday over at ZDNet – “The (Government 2.0) revolution should be televised.

I agree with Andrea that we need more Citizen 2.0’s and Patriot 2.0’s, but in order to do that we need more folks like Dan Powers – writing blogs, sharing important topics on Twitter and bringing another slug of people along with him in the process.

And, believe me, we need as many citizens and patriots as we can get these days.

9 comments ↓

#1 Mike Keliher on 11.26.08 at 10:58 am

Patriot 2.0, huh? The Twitcoats are coming! The Twitcoats are coming!

Or something…

Anyway, speaking of Government 2.0 and the like, Jeff Jarvis does some great writing on that and related subjects. For example, check out his “United States of Google” post.

#2 Gina Schreck on 11.27.08 at 6:07 pm

It is a shame that there are so many whacknuts out there in our world that spoil the creative work of people like Dan, but I am glad to hear that he has found a new avenue to express his opinions and find others who will support and twitter along with him.

Hopefully Dan will remember the wisdom shared by the philosophers the Jackson 5 when they said, “One bad apple don’t spoil the whole bunch girl (or boy).”

In the mean time I look forward to meeting and tweeting with him on the important (and not so important) issues in Boulder!

#3 Dan Powers on 11.27.08 at 9:32 pm

Thanks for the gracious refernce , Michael – I really like the Patriot 2.0 concept. As I read that article again I will look to comment further.

As you can see I’m just getting into Twitter and I appreciate seeing how you’re using it for productive ends. My first thought about Twitter was cynical; who would care what random thoughts I have? But I am fascinated by the synergy possible you’ve shown me.

Plus, I’ve used if for random personal comments, not anything professional or even articulate. Should strangers know I like Elephant Malt Liquor on Thanks giving? (Haven’t had it in a year) or that my baby daughter is sick? And especially as this gives away details of my life, and by my own choosing, what kind of online resume am I unintentionally building?

That’s what’s wild about web 2.0 capabilities. Anyone over 25 (if not 15) is taking their habitual, subconscious manners of communication and pasting that behavior into new vehicles that are more easily traced, compiled and catalogued than I think we realize. We never established mental filters on our commenting via some online tool. For example, right now, I’m just journaling really. I’m not seeing any body language, hearing sighs or grunts, being interrupted or getting any feedback. I can rant and stream-of-consciousness myself til I feel I’ve said what’s on my mind.

Bottom line – is that a good thing?

My experience with the blog is that a few bad apples as Gina referenced are both guaranteed and exponentially more damaging. Their ability to rant unchallenged can quickly tar a conversation, blog, website, whatever, and with millions of choices on where to participate online, reasonable people move on.

Such people can stifle the growth of an online intellectual movement very quickly. Critical mass is necessary for any Patriot and Web 2.0 participant to produce change. The double edge sword of easy and global 2.0 technology is how anonymous, savvy, malicious and just plain weird people can sabatoge an effort.

To go on a further tangent, you know those ridiculous audience meters and “points scored” graphincs on CNN during the presidential debates? I envision them gone for the 2012 election. You’ll have the option to see cetain people’s reactions sonewhere online, but the real news stations (there’s a discussion topic) will have Truth Checks happening in real time with the candidates comments. Running fact checks will call them on all their points, showing who’s shading the truth, telling the truth, plain wrong, etc. Ahh, this is my dream.

So, I’m proving my own first point as I rant on here (the family is all sleeping due to illness, hence my chatting online on Thanksgiving). Thanks for involving me in your blog, I’m glad to be back in touch.

#4 Michael Benidt on 11.28.08 at 9:19 am

Thanks Mike,

Especially for the link you provided in your comment. The author of the thought-provoking blog post in Mike’s comment above is Jeff Jarvis, who among millions of other things is one of the creators of “The Yuckiest Site on the Internet.” It’s worth going to that site – but it’s even more worth reading Jeff Jarvis’ “United States of Google.”

#5 Michael Benidt on 11.28.08 at 9:34 am

Thanks Gina,

Wrote this recently about Gina – “For one thing, she’s way more optimistic about new technologies than I am.” So, Dan, if you want some positive encouragement that these online tools are a good thing, don’t hang around folks like us. Get to know Gina Schreck. Don’t know about her philosopher’s comment, that “One bad apple don’t spoil the whole bunch girl (or boy).”

I’d advise you stick with the great pundit, Will Rogers – “Politics is applesauce.”

#6 Michael Benidt on 11.28.08 at 9:56 am

Thanks for the comment, Dan,

We write this blog for people like you – and all the other folks who have questions and reservations about the new online tools. You should be skeptical about the privacy implications, the societal implications and the mind-altering implications. We know of no more chilling recent article than “Is Google Making Us Stoopid?- What the Internet is doing to our brains.”

On the other hand, I recently interviewed Dave Taylor for an upcoming blog article. He’s a Boulder “tech celeb” who you may well know. You asked in your comment, “Plus, I’ve used if for random personal comments, not anything professional or even articulate. Should strangers know I like Elephant Malt Liquor on Thanks giving? (Haven’t had it in a year) or that my baby daughter is sick?

Dave Taylor tells his Twitter followers this kind of thing – and he does so touchingly, while walking his own clearly defined line between openness and privacy. He also actually “gets people together” in the real world – something rare on Twitter. Don’t give up or dismiss all this until you read how Dave puts this tool to use.

The world was better off because of your blog – and it will be better off the more engaged you become again.

None of this is about the technologies. Those are far too touted, with far too few people willing to say, “Wait a minute, let’s stop and think about this stuff.” If it has value at all – it’s not because of the technologies. It’s because of people like you.

#7 Gary W. Anderson on 11.28.08 at 10:45 am

Michael, good blog post. Yes, we need more involvement from the political community to help insure true and more transparent democratic process. If I understand the issue Dan Powers closed down his blog because of negative comments. Sad!! I have noticed on my own blog that there are crazies and crawlers posting mostly juke. This is sad, but we cannot let this stop us.

#8 Michael Benidt on 12.05.08 at 11:55 am

Thanks Gary,

If there is a positive advocate for the online world, it’s you. Wherever Dan is going we’ll let you guys know what his next project is. Right now – you can find him at http://www.tripdata.com/ – where you can Dream/Travel/Grow. But he’s got something more up his sleeve and we’re looking forward to it.

#9 Searching Twitter Gets Tougher, but Still Pays Off — Hidden Business Treasures on 01.08.10 at 1:46 pm

[...] now, if you read this blog (Just the Guy We Need, Going Next Door for a Drink), you know you have to start your search, not on Twitter, but at their [...]

Leave a Comment