<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continuous Partial Inanity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/</link>
	<description>Hidden Internet Tips For Sales And Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:38:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unjournalism &#187; 5 things to be thankful for in social media</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12449</link>
		<dc:creator>Unjournalism &#187; 5 things to be thankful for in social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12449</guid>
		<description>[...] could go on for days about how cool Twitter is. People like Michael Benidt will, with good reason, occasionally throw some water on my fire, which is great. As my seemingly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could go on for days about how cool Twitter is. People like Michael Benidt will, with good reason, occasionally throw some water on my fire, which is great. As my seemingly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12373</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12373</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jacquie, Kasey, Annie and Amanda,

Boy, I think we all better listen to these college, who have a project to study Twitter this quarter. They know social networking pretty much inside and out - and their verdict on Twitter so far is a big thumbs down.

Wisdom, in this case, seems to be missing in those older than university age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jacquie, Kasey, Annie and Amanda,</p>
<p>Boy, I think we all better listen to these college, who have a project to study Twitter this quarter. They know social networking pretty much inside and out &#8211; and their verdict on Twitter so far is a big thumbs down.</p>
<p>Wisdom, in this case, seems to be missing in those older than university age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacquie Devine</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacquie Devine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12333</guid>
		<description>Michael, I&#039;m yet another one of Ellen&#039;s students. After using Twitter for about two weeks, I can&#039;t find a productive use for it in my life right now. Yes, it is an entertaining way to waste time, but I struggle to find a purpose for it in a professional atmosphere. I would find it much easier - and more private - to e-mail or instant message co-workers with updates or other information.
It boggles my mind to see some people that had &#039;updates&#039; several times in one hour - do they pay people to twitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I&#8217;m yet another one of Ellen&#8217;s students. After using Twitter for about two weeks, I can&#8217;t find a productive use for it in my life right now. Yes, it is an entertaining way to waste time, but I struggle to find a purpose for it in a professional atmosphere. I would find it much easier &#8211; and more private &#8211; to e-mail or instant message co-workers with updates or other information.<br />
It boggles my mind to see some people that had &#8216;updates&#8217; several times in one hour &#8211; do they pay people to twitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasey Wassenaar</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12292</link>
		<dc:creator>Kasey Wassenaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12292</guid>
		<description>Mike, 
 I am also in Ellen&#039;s PR campaigns class. 

As a student I feel that Twitter would be more useful to someone actually working in the profession. It is quite similar to instant messaging, but much less private. It could be a great way to keep in touch with colleagues, or get a quick news scoop. Although it seems as if Twitter is mostly mindless chatter. If I needed information from someone I would rather e-mail them instead of putting my comment out for the whole world to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
 I am also in Ellen&#8217;s PR campaigns class. </p>
<p>As a student I feel that Twitter would be more useful to someone actually working in the profession. It is quite similar to instant messaging, but much less private. It could be a great way to keep in touch with colleagues, or get a quick news scoop. Although it seems as if Twitter is mostly mindless chatter. If I needed information from someone I would rather e-mail them instead of putting my comment out for the whole world to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Nolte</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12287</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Nolte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12287</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael, I&#039;m another one of Ellen Mrja&#039;s students.  We were urged to try Twitter out this semester and so far, it&#039;s proved to be just one more application that makes me unproductive.  Facebook and Myspace have already taken enough days off my life, I don&#039;t need one more thing to distract me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael, I&#8217;m another one of Ellen Mrja&#8217;s students.  We were urged to try Twitter out this semester and so far, it&#8217;s proved to be just one more application that makes me unproductive.  Facebook and Myspace have already taken enough days off my life, I don&#8217;t need one more thing to distract me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12164</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12164</guid>
		<description>By the way - I answered Chris Boyer&#039;s challenge to summarize our blog article on one Twitter entry. I forgot to put it here:

@ChrisBoyer - Blog article summarized. If you could listen in to every conversation going on before a football game, would you want to? Less than 140.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way &#8211; I answered Chris Boyer&#8217;s challenge to summarize our blog article on one Twitter entry. I forgot to put it here:</p>
<p>@ChrisBoyer &#8211; Blog article summarized. If you could listen in to every conversation going on before a football game, would you want to? Less than 140.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12163</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12163</guid>
		<description>Ah, the wisdom of younger computer users. 

Thanks, Amanda, for keeping all this in perspective. We&#039;ve been intrigued to find out that almost none of our teen and 20-something acquaintances (and relatives and kids) have even heard of Twitter. 

I&#039;m gonna&#039; go out on a limb and say from watching those younger tea leaves - Twitter will have a short shelf life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the wisdom of younger computer users. </p>
<p>Thanks, Amanda, for keeping all this in perspective. We&#8217;ve been intrigued to find out that almost none of our teen and 20-something acquaintances (and relatives and kids) have even heard of Twitter. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna&#8217; go out on a limb and say from watching those younger tea leaves &#8211; Twitter will have a short shelf life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12160</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Wilcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12160</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael, I&#039;m in Ellen&#039;s class

When it comes to Twitter I believe the only time that this site was interesting to me was during this last election. It was fun to see everyone opinion about the results as they were coming in. 

Other then that I find that I can get the same satisfaction out of an instant messaging service as I can from Twitter. It&#039;s an nifty little tooling website but beyond that, I find that I&#039;m just wasting my time on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael, I&#8217;m in Ellen&#8217;s class</p>
<p>When it comes to Twitter I believe the only time that this site was interesting to me was during this last election. It was fun to see everyone opinion about the results as they were coming in. </p>
<p>Other then that I find that I can get the same satisfaction out of an instant messaging service as I can from Twitter. It&#8217;s an nifty little tooling website but beyond that, I find that I&#8217;m just wasting my time on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keliher</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keliher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12122</guid>
		<description>Many of those people are using these tools to promote themselves. But to speak in the broadest of terms, promotion isn&#039;t bad -- irrelevant promotion is.

When people on infomercials yell at me about how cool their new miracle sponges are, that&#039;s worthless. When Michael Benidt twitters about his most recent thought-provoking blog post, that&#039;s valuable. When I guy named Ike Pigott and I have conservations about political philosophy and then start writing about raising the quality of political discourse -- and I&#039;ve never met Ike in person, only on the Web -- that says something positive.

So this is your naive optimist, signing off... (...in order to return to twittering.)

mjk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of those people are using these tools to promote themselves. But to speak in the broadest of terms, promotion isn&#8217;t bad &#8212; irrelevant promotion is.</p>
<p>When people on infomercials yell at me about how cool their new miracle sponges are, that&#8217;s worthless. When Michael Benidt twitters about his most recent thought-provoking blog post, that&#8217;s valuable. When I guy named Ike Pigott and I have conservations about political philosophy and then start writing about raising the quality of political discourse &#8212; and I&#8217;ve never met Ike in person, only on the Web &#8212; that says something positive.</p>
<p>So this is your naive optimist, signing off&#8230; (&#8230;in order to return to twittering.)</p>
<p>mjk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/comment-page-1/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldencompass.com/blog/continuous-partial-inanity/#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Keliher,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been called &quot;shallow and ignorant&quot; before so we can take it. (And, for those reading this - Mike Keliher is one of our guides to the world of social networking - so we&#039;re not yelling at each other, even though it might sound like it.) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do believe that too often technology is alienating people from other people. The main use of LinkedIn, SecondLife, Twitter and the rest of the vaunted social networking tools seems to be self-promotion, not relationship building. You use it to build relationships, but here&#039;s a challenge - go to the general Twitter feed and count the serious, valuable ones. I&#039;ll even take you on if you choose the folks you&#039;re following. Most of them are promoting themselves, saying they&#039;re going to lunch, or speaking in code language.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, I still like you - and value the relationship that we started online.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Keliher,</p>
<p>We have been called &#8220;shallow and ignorant&#8221; before so we can take it. (And, for those reading this &#8211; Mike Keliher is one of our guides to the world of social networking &#8211; so we&#8217;re not yelling at each other, even though it might sound like it.) </p>
<p>I do believe that too often technology is alienating people from other people. The main use of LinkedIn, SecondLife, Twitter and the rest of the vaunted social networking tools seems to be self-promotion, not relationship building. You use it to build relationships, but here&#8217;s a challenge &#8211; go to the general Twitter feed and count the serious, valuable ones. I&#8217;ll even take you on if you choose the folks you&#8217;re following. Most of them are promoting themselves, saying they&#8217;re going to lunch, or speaking in code language.</p>
<p>But, I still like you &#8211; and value the relationship that we started online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
